← Day 56全部Day 58 →
Day 57 · 印度 第 4 阶段

If Everyone Has AI on Tap, What Sets Leaders Apart? — nasscom NTLF 2026

当每个人都能用上 AI,领导者靠什么胜出?

练习进度自动保存
🔊

本日音频 · material.mp3

正常 1.0 倍速 · 用于 Step 1 Blind Listening 与 Step 5 Final Listening

下载 ⬇

今日材料

Sourcenasscom (官方 YouTube)
Duration32:08 (1928s)
CEFRC1
连续跟随目标连续 10 分钟
说话者 Speaker主持人 / 多位嘉宾
话题 Topic当每个人都能用上 AI,领导者靠什么胜出?

0-5 分钟 · Blind Listening(盲听)

规则: - 关闭字幕(中英都不开)。 - 正常 1.0 倍速。 - 禁止暂停、禁止倒退。 - 听漏一句就跳,绝不追回。

听后回答(口头或笔头): 1. Who is talking? 2. What are they talking about? 3. What happened / what is the main point?

📝 答题反思

先盲听,再写下针对性题目的答案

用 1-2 句话用自己的话回答下面的问题。点「✨ AI 判断」后,AI 会对照当天 transcript 给出参考要点与评分。

5-10 分钟 · Accent Mapping(口音映射)

目标:把「印度英语的声音」映射成你认识的词。

做法: - 选刚才盲听时最「卡」的 2-3 个位置。 - 单独重放这些 3-5 秒的小片段,逐词听。 - 在 accent_observations.md 里记录: - What I heard(你听到了什么音) - Actual phrase(对照后真实原文) - Error type(P/B/S/V/G/A/K)

提示: - 别急着下结论「他发音错了」,先问「这是不是印度英语里常见的声音对应」。 - 印度英语个体差异极大,同样的音在不同说话者身上可能完全不同。

错误类型标记: - P = Pronunciation 发音(词被读成另一个音) - B = Word boundary 词边界(没听出词与词的边界) - S = Stress/rhythm 重音/节奏 - V = Vowel quality 元音 - G = Grammar 语法 - A = Accent variation 口音变体 - K = Unknown word 生词

10-18 分钟 · Long Chunk(长段跟随)

做法: - 从开始连续播放,目标连续跟随 连续 10 分钟。 - 中间不暂停(若材料不足目标时长,则一次听完)。 - 只追踪「意思」:谁在讲什么、下一步要做什么。 - 掉线了?Miss it. Drop it. Keep going. - 结束后用 2-3 句英文总结这段讲了什么。

18-25 分钟 · Transcript Check(对照原文)

做法: 打开视频平台自带的英文字幕(或平台自动字幕,标 AUTO_GENERATED)。 只对照以下三种问题: A:单词认识,但声音没听出来。 B:单词认识,但意思反应太慢。 C:真正不知道的表达。 (若平台无字幕,则跳过本步,直接进入复述。)

重点:只解决「没听出来」的问题,不做逐句翻译。

把最难的 3 个片段写进 difficult_segments.md

25-30 分钟 · Final Retest(复测)

做法: - 关闭 transcript 和字幕。 - 从头完整播放(或播放目标长度),禁止暂停。 - 结束后 30-60 秒英文口头复述: Basically, they were talking about… At first… Then… The main point was… In the end… - 对比这次 vs 第一次盲听:理解率是否提升?掉线是否减少?

📊 每日记录

本日材料(已下载本地音频)

打开本目录 watching_instruction.md,按官方 URL 在 YouTube 合法播放指定片段。

  • 视频:If Everyone Has AI on Tap, What Sets Leaders Apart? — nasscom NTLF 2026
  • 建议播放范围:0:00–12:00(约 12 分钟)
  • 播放规则:禁止暂停、禁止倒退、关闭字幕(Step 1)。

Daily Score

  • 理解率:____ %
  • 明显掉线次数:____
  • 最长连续跟随时间:____
  • 需要 transcript 才能理解的比例:____ %
  • Accent Adaptation Score(1-10):____
  • 今天最明显的口音障碍(1-3 个):____

Accent Adaptation Score 定义(1-10): - 10 = 完全适应:第一次听就几乎不需要看 transcript,印度英语不再是障碍。 - 8-9 = 很好:能连续跟随目标时长,偶尔个别词要靠上下文猜。 - 6-7 = 良好:能跟住主线,但每隔一段会掉线一次,需要重听一句。 - 4-5 = 一般:能抓住大意,但频繁掉线,明显依赖 transcript。 - 1-3 = 困难:大部分听不懂,印度英语的发音/节奏造成严重障碍。

本日主题

当每个人都能用上 AI,领导者靠什么胜出?

Notes

nasscom 官方频道。圆桌讨论,印度 AI 会议 panel。

Transcript · 英文原文

先盲听再对照。只找 A(没听出)B(反应慢)C(真不会)三类问题。Whisper ASR 为默认,YouTube/火山引擎供对照。

# Day 57 — Whisper (faster-whisper small, int8) 转写

设备 CPU,语言 en,VAD 过滤。ASR 生成,可能含识别错误。

==================================================

Let's go straight into our next panel and we are taking a look at data disruption and

the human edge, very well connected to that poll that we have also just seen.

So let's be honest, we've spent years now listening to the line that says data is the

new oil and now AI has come and drilled, refined and automated half of the refinery

at the same time as well.

So if everyone has intelligence on tap, what actually then sets leaders apart?

Not more dashboards, not faster models, but something that is far more human.

Context, curiosity, the ability to connect dots, something that no algorithm is trained

to see.

And so this session explores the real edge in an AI saturated world, the human one.

So please join me as we welcome a fantastic panel that we have coming up ahead.

We have Mr. Sameer Gupta, Chief Analytics Officer and Managing Director, DBS Bank.

Mr. Sanjeev Jain, Chief Operating Officer at Wipro Limited.

Mr. Ashwin Mithal, Executive Chairman, C5I and guiding this conversation, we have our

host Amit Anshu, Head of GSI and IT Business at Amazon Web Services India.

Good afternoon everyone.

So we have an August panel here and this is indeed a very great topic which we have

needs a lot of leadership insights and I think we have the right set of people,

leaders here who would provide their perspective on this.

Look data has always been an integral part of how today corporations, institutions run

themselves.

Honestly those organizations and those enterprises who have really been able to use the right

tools, the right build right practices to harness data have ended up understanding

their customers and their markets better and they have been able to serve their customers

in their best possible way or achieve those objectives which they have started to go

for.

What's also happening today right is that this wave of intelligence which we all are

seeing which is coming up and in many ways this is an accentuating wave.

It superimposes itself on this data.

It gives more power in the hands of builders and companies and institutions and communities

to make, to take decisions better.

The core question today which we have today is that will the leadership evolve with these

changes.

As intelligence becomes very pervasive, it is available everywhere, is there a need for

a more prominent human edge or a different human edge?

Is there a need for leadership to maybe evolve a little?

Yes, systems can process data better, they can interpret data better, they can offer

you multitude of choices.

But the question I'm going to put forward to this panel is overall does the system understand

deeper business domain better?

Does it know the art of the human art of possible?

Is it able to find meaning in ambiguity?

Like leaders who have always cruised through multiple moral dilemmas and have used high

bar of ethical standards, especially the prominent panel which we have here, can those systems

do that?

Can they really know how to balance risk versus opportunity?

So there are a lot of questions which I think is in our minds and we all are trying

to find answers to.

So that's the kind of backdrop which we have today and I'd love to get the perspective

from the panel here.

Okay.

Thank you, thank you so much for setting the context.

So like Amit rightly said, we've all been used to doing so many tasks every day and taking

so many decisions, some micro decisions, some micro decisions and that has been the

way we functioned and those decisions have not necessarily used the full extent of our

human creativity and intellect but what has meaningfully changed now is that a lot of those

decisions can be taken by models or by agents and not only taken decisions but actually

deployed into actions but as we all know what AI doesn't have is context and so what

we have to be able to very effectively do as leaders and even as team, even our teams

is we need to be able to do context engineering and to be able to effectively engineer context

is a different skill.

You need to be able to ask the right questions before you get the answers and along with that

you need to regularly update context because context also evolves in our businesses, in

the industry, etc.

Models tend to drift and start not giving relevant outputs over time as business context

changes.

So we regularly do context engineering and update context and then we need to orchestrate

and oversee processes, handle exceptions, you mentioned ethics, handle ethical issues.

So when we are deploying models and agents with enterprises we are trying to figure

out how do we rewire and ensure that when we restructure processes we bring in

the right combination of human and agent and where all humans come in.

Awesome.

Thanks Ashwin.

Maybe a question, maybe an add on question to a great answer you give right now is do

you have the responsibility of building the pipeline of leadership within your organization

for tomorrow?

How are you doing that as well?

Yeah, no great question.

So you know we are at a very different time, right?

What is needed in the future from our teams and our leaders?

There are of course a lot of skills that we have all acquired which are very much needed

but then there is also some change in what the demands are from us.

And you know we all know critical thinking, adaptability, intellectual curiosity, these

remain key.

There are always going to be a very small number of people that will require the

super deep technical skills but now for the rest of the team members you need

to know enough technically but then along with that you need to be able to bring in

these other critical thinking and other types of skills to complement that effectively.

And you have senior people who have a lot of the context, who have the domain whether

around an industry or function or a process but sometimes lack you know can be, can lack

the adaptability and we need to you know help them become more adaptable.

You will have you know young graduates that you hire which will have maybe in many cases

more adaptability but may lack you know the context and domain.

So how can we really you know and why does it take ten years for someone to become

experienced in a certain area, right?

If we can we challenge human intellect and ramp those people up in two, three years

and at the same time give that you know quotient of adaptability and curiosity to our

senior people.

Both are very relevant you know how can we help both transform into the new way of

working is the question.

For the young people also we have to bring in emotional maturity that you know you

can train on context, you can understand supply chain, you can understand marketing,

you can understand AI agents very quickly but how do you then bring in enough of

that you know emotional quotient so that because when you know do some of

this work you need to bring in the human element into your thinking as well.

Thank you.

As a leader and as an executive in a global bank you are embedding AI in your

entire work flow, right?

Let me ask you this and pretty much similar to what Ashwin answered, how is the

human edge evolving the way you design your work flows now and same

the other question just said keeping that in mind how are you building that

leadership pipeline for the new future.

I think the we are at an inflection point the technology advancement is immense

and therefore the possibilities are immense but having said that think of a

scenario where intelligence is totally democratized everyone has the same

intelligence then from an enterprise standpoint or individual standpoint what

is the competitive advantage what is the differentiator actually it's the

human creativity the decision-making power in my mind that will become even

more important to be the differentiator in a word era where everything of

young intelligence is democratized so but how decision-making is done is going

to evolve dramatically today as humans maybe for a decision we consider 10

parameters or maybe 10 possibilities in the future we have an AI agent which

is helping us think through maybe thousands of parameters thousands of

possibilities but being able to discern which one to take being able

to ask the right questions that will mean that our decision-making process has

to dramatically change otherwise we will not get value out of it so this whole

evolution of our human decision-making is going to be very key in DBS we are

very clear that we want to be an AI enabled bank with a heart we believe

that it is going to be humans which are being enhanced by AI but it's

always going to be a human working closely with agents which will drive

the next level of competitive advantage for us and that's where how we are

thinking of it and in that context within that context leadership is very

important how do you train not just leadership but how do you train

everyone to ask the right questions to understand what the technology can

do well what it can't do how do you understand when it goes wrong so all

of this is an evolution and these are very much part of how we do it the

other thing as we think about the future in the past learning was all about

knowing I mean I remember when I was in school

but how does it matter but marks were given by that right today what is

going to be more important is the attitude do you have the right attitude

do you have a learning mindset are you able to make a decision are you able

to synthesize and ask the right questions and that's where human edge

will continue to drive that so I'm actually a firm believer that the human

edge is going to be probably the only competitive advantage of the future

given that this technology will democratize data democratize intelligence

democratize knowledge I agree with you Samir I think the human edge is

becoming more and more prominent and I love this part of your answer that

having this skill to ask the right question framed the right question

# Day 57 — YouTube 自动生成字幕(AUTO_GENERATED)

覆盖训练段 000–12 分钟。已去滚动字幕重叠。ASR 生成可能含识别错误。

==================================================

Let's go straight into our next panel and we're taking a look at data disruption and the human edge. Very well connected to that poll that we have also just seen. So, let's be honest, we've spent years now listening to the line that says data is the new oil. And now, AI has come and drilled, refined, and automated half of the refinery at the same time as well. So, if everyone has intelligence on tap, what actually then sets leaders apart? Not more dashboards, not faster models, but

something that is far more human. Context, curiosity, the ability to connect dots, something that no algorithm is trained to see. And so, this session explores the real edge in an AI-saturated world, the human one. So, please join me as we welcome a fantastic panel that we have coming up ahead. We have Mr. Sameer Gupta, Chief Analytics Officer and Managing Director, DBS Bank. Mr. Sanjeev Jain, Chief Operating Officer at Wipro Limited. >> [applause] >> [applause] >> Mr. Ashwin Mittal, Executive Chairman, C5 I. And guiding this conversation,

we have our host, Amit Anshu, Head of GSI and IT Business at Amazon Web Services India. [music] Good afternoon, everyone. Good afternoon, everyone. So, we have an august panel here and this is indeed a very great topic which we have. Needs lot of leadership insights and I think we have the right set of people and leaders here who would who would provide their perspective on this. Uh look, data has always been um an integral part of how today corporations, institutions corporations, institutions uh run themselves. Um

Um Honestly, those organizations and those enterprises who have really been able to use the right tools, the right build right practices right practices to harness data have ended up understanding their customers and their markets better, and they have been able to serve their customers in the best possible way. Um Um or achieve those objectives which they have started to um uh goal for. uh goal for. What's also happening today, right, is that that this wave of intelligence which we all are seeing, which is which is

coming up. And in many way, this is an accentuating wave. It it superimposes itself uh on this on this [snorts] data. It gives more power in the hands of builders and companies and institutions and communities to and communities to to make to take decisions better, right? The The core question today which we have today is is um um that that will the leadership will the leadership evolve with these changes, right? As intelligence becomes very pervasive, uh it is available everywhere, is there a need for a

more prominent human edge or a different human edge? different human edge? Is there a need for leadership to maybe evolve a little? Yes, systems can process data better, they can interpret data better, they can offer you multitude of choices. >> [snorts] >> [snorts] >> But the question I've been I'm going to put forward to this panel is um um overall, does the system understand deeper business domain better, right? Does it know the art of the human art of possible? Is it able to find meaning in

ambiguity, right? Uh ambiguity, right? Uh like leaders, right? Who have always uh cruised through multiple moral dilemmas and have used high bar of ethical standards, especially the standards, especially the the prominent panel which we have here. Uh Uh can those systems do that, right? Uh can they really know how to balance risk versus opportunity, right? So, there are lot of questions which I think is in our minds and we all are trying to find answers to. answers to. Um so, that's that's the kind of backdrop

which we have today. Now, I'd love to get the perspective from the panel here. Okay. Okay. Uh okay. Thank you. Thank you so much for setting the context. Uh so, uh like like Amit rightly said, uh we've all been used to, you know, doing so many tasks every day and taking so many decisions, some micro decisions, some macro decisions. Uh Uh and and uh you know, that has been the way we functioned and those decisions have not necessarily used the full extent of our human creativity

and intellect. Uh but what has meaningfully changed now is that lot of those decisions can be taken by models or by agents and, you know, not only taken decisions, but actually deployed into actions. Uh but as we all know, what AI doesn't have is context. Uh Uh and so, what we have to be able to very effectively do as leaders and even as team you know, even our teams, is we need to be able to do context engineering, right? And to be able to effectively engineer

context is a different skill, right? Uh you need to be able to ask the right questions uh before you get the answers. And along with that, you need to regularly update context because context also evolves in our businesses, in the industry, etc. Models tend to drift uh and, you know, start uh not giving relevant outputs over time as business context changes. We need to be able to regularly up- to do context engineering and update context. And then we need to orchestrate and oversee processes, handle exceptions.

You mentioned ethics, handle ethical issues. handle ethical issues. Uh so, when we are deploying models and, you know, agents with enterprises, we're trying to figure out, okay, how do we rewire and ensure that when we restructure processes, we bring in the right combination of human and agent and where all where all uh where all humans uh humans come in. Awesome. Thanks, Ashwin. Maybe um a question, maybe an add-on question to uh a great answer you gave right now is, do you have the responsibility of building

the pipeline of leadership within your organization for tomorrow? How are you How are you doing that as well? Yeah, no, great question. So, uh you know, uh we are at a very different time, right? What is needed in the future from our teams and our leaders, uh there are of course a lot of skills that we've all acquired, which are very much needed. But then, there is also some change in what the demands are from us. us. Um Um and uh you know, we all know

critical thinking, adaptability, intellectual thinking, adaptability, intellectual curiosity, these remain key. Right? There are There are always going to be a very small number of people that will require the super deep technical skills. skills. But now, for the rest of the team members, members, you need to know enough technically, but then along with that, you need to be able to bring in these other critical thinking and other types of skills to complement that effectively. complement that effectively. And you have senior people uh who have a lot

of the context, who have the domain, whether around an industry or function or around a process, but sometimes lack, you know, can be can lack the adaptability. And we need to, you know, help them become more adaptable. You will have, you know, uh young graduates that you hire which will have, maybe, in many cases more adaptability, but may lack uh you know, the context and domain. Uh so, how can we really, you know, and why does it take 10 years for someone to become experienced in

a certain area, right? If we can we challenge human intellect and ramp those people up in 2-3 years? Uh and at the same time give that, you know, quotient of adaptability and curiosity to our senior people. So, both are very relevant. You know, how can we help both transform into the uh new way of working is is the question. For the young people, also we have to bring in emotional maturity. Uh that, you know, you can train on context, you can understand supply chain, you can

understand marketing, you can understand AI agents very quickly. But, how do you then bring in uh enough of that uh you know, uh emotional quotient so that because when you, you know, do some of this work in need to bring in the human element into your thinking as well. Thank Ashwin. Uh Samir, as a leader and a as an executive in a in a global bank, I'm I'm uh you are embedding AI in your entire workflow, right? Um workflow, right? Um let me ask you this

and pretty much similar to what uh Ashwin answered. How is the human edge uh evolving uh the way you design your workflows now? And and and same the add-on question you said, keeping that in mind, how are you building that leadership pipeline for the new future? So, I I think the we are at an inflection point. The technology advancement is immense and therefore the possibilities are immense. But, having said that, think of a scenario where intelligent is intelligence is totally democratized. Everyone has the same intelligence.

Then, from an enterprise standpoint or individual standpoint, what is the competitive advantage? What is the differentiator? differentiator? Actually, it's the human creativity, the decision-making power. In my mind, that will become even more important to be the differentiator in a era where everything of your intelligence is democratized. So, but democratized. So, but how decision-making is done is going to evolve dramatically. Today, as humans, maybe for a decision we consider 10 parameters or maybe 10 possibilities. In the future, we have an AI agent which is helping us

think through maybe thousands of parameters, thousands of possibilities. But, being able to discern which one to take, being able to ask the right questions, that will mean that our decision-making process has to dramatically change. Otherwise, we will not get value out of it. So, this whole evolution of our human decision-making is going to be very key. In DBS, we are very clear that we want to be an AI-enabled bank with a heart. We believe that it is going to be humans which are being enhanced by

AI, but it's always going to be a human working closely with agents which will drive the next level of competitive advantage for us. And that's where how we are thinking of it. And in that context, within that context, leadership is very important. How do you train, not just leadership, but how do you train everyone to ask the right questions, to understand what the technology can do well, what it can't do, how do you understand when it goes wrong? So, all of this is an evolution and

these are very much part of how we do it. The other thing as we think about the future, future, in the past, learning was all about knowing. I mean, I remember when I was in school, oh, Panipat ki ladai kab hui was very important, but how does it matter? matter? Uh, but marks were given by that, right? >> [snorts] >> [snorts] >> Today, what is going to be more important is the attitude. Do you have the right attitude? Do you have a learning mindset? Are you

able to make a decision? Are you able to synthesize and ask the right questions? And that's where human edge will continue to drive that. So, I'm actually a firm believer that the human edge is going to be probably the only competitive advantage of the future given that this technology will democratize data, democratize democratize data, democratize intelligence, democratize knowledge. I agree with you, Samir. I think the human edge is becoming more and more prominent. Um I I love this part of your answer that having answer that

having the skill to ask the right question, frame the right question, know the

# Day 57 — 火山引擎 录音文件识别(volc.seedasr.auc)

豆包大模型 ASR,异步接口。可能含识别错误,仅供听力对照。

==================================================

Let's go straight into our next panel, and we're taking a look at data disruption and the human edge, very well connected to that pole that we have also just seen.

So let's be honest, we've spent years now listening to the line that says data is the new oil and now AI has come and drilled, refined and automated half of the refinery at the same time as well.

So if everyone has intelligence on tap, what actually then sets leaders apart?

Not more dashboards, not faster models, but something that is far more human context, curiosity, the ability to connect dots, something that no algorithm is trained to see.

And so this session explores the real edge in an AI saturated world, the human one.

So please join me as we welcome a fantastic panel that we have coming up ahead.

We have Mister Samir Gupta, Chief Analytics Officer and Managing Director DBS Bank.

Mister Sanjeev Jen, Chief Operating Officer at Wipro Limited.

Mister Ashwin Mittal, Executive Chairman, C 5 I.

And guiding this conversation, we have our host, Amit Anshu, head of GSI and it business at Amazon Web Services India.

Good afternoon, everyone.

So we have an August panel here, and this is indeed a very great topic, which we have needs a lot of leadership insights.

And I think we have the right set of people, leaders here who would provide their perspective on this.

Look, data has always been an integral part of how today corporations, institutions run themselves.

Honestly, those organizations and those enterprises who have really been able to use the right tools, the right build, right practices to harness data have ended up understanding their customers and their markets better and they have been able to serve their customers in their best possible way or.

Achieve those objectives which they have started to goal for.

What's also happening today, right, is that this wave of intelligence, which we all are seeing, which is, which is coming up and in many ways, this is an accentuating wave it, it superimposes itself on this, on this data.

It gives more power in the hands of builders and companies and institutions and communities to, to make, to take decisions better.

Right?

The core question today, which we have today, is that will the leadership evolve with these changes, right?

As intelligence becomes very pervasive, it is available everywhere.

Is there a need for a more prominent human edge or a different human edge?

Is there a need for leadership to maybe evolve a little?

Yes.

Systems can process data better, they can interpret data better, they can offer you multitude of choices.

But the question I've been, I'm going to put forward to this panel is overall, does the system understand deeper business domain better?

Right?

Does it know the art of the human art of possible?

Is it able to find meaning in ambiguity, right?

Like leaders, right, who have always cruised through multiple moral dilemmas and have used high bar of ethical standards, especially the the prominent panel which we have here.

Can those systems do that right?

Can they really know how to balance risk versus opportunity, right?

So there are a lot of questions which I think is in our minds and we all are trying to find answers to.

So that's, that's the kind of backdrop which we have today.

And I'd love to get the perspective from the panel here.

Okay.

Okay.

Thank you.

Thank you so much for setting the context.

So like, like Amit rightly said, we've all been used to, you know, doing so many tasks every day and taking so many decisions, some micro decisions, some macro decisions.

Uh, you know, that has been the way we function.

And those decisions have not necessarily used the full extent of our human creativity and intellect.

Uh, but what is meaningfully changed now is that a lot of those decisions can be taken by models or by agents and, you know, not only taken decisions but actually deployed into actions.

But as we all know, what AI doesn't have is context.

And so what we have to be able to very effectively do as leaders and even as team, you know, even our teams is we need to be able to do context engineering, right, and to be able to effectively engineer context is a different skill, right?

You need to be able to ask the right questions, uh, before you get the answers.

And along with that, you need to regularly update context because context also evolves in our businesses, in the industry, etcetera, models tend to drift, uh, and, you know, start, uh, not giving relevant outputs.

Over time as business context changes, we need to be able to regularly up so do context engineering and update context.

And then we need to orchestrate and oversee processes, handle exceptions, you mentioned ethics, handle ethical issues.

Uh, so when we are deploying models and, you know, agents with enterprises, we are trying to figure out, okay, how do we rewire and ensure that when we restructure processes, we bring in the right combination of human and agent and we're all where all humans.

Humans come in.

Awesome.

Thanks, Ashwin.

Maybe a question, maybe an add on question to a great answer you give right now is, do you have the responsibility of building the pipeline of leadership within your organization for tomorrow?

How are you?

How are you doing that as well?

Yeah, no, great question.

So, you know, we are at a very different time, right?

What is needed in the future from our teams and our leaders?

There are, of course, a lot of skills that we've all acquired, which are very much needed.

But then there is also some change in what the demands are from us.

Um, and uh, you know, we all know critical thinking, adaptability, intellectual curiosity, these remain key, right?

There are, there are always going to be a very small number of people that will require the super deep technical skills.

But now for the rest of the team members, you need to know enough technically, but then along with that, you need to be able to bring in these other critical thinking and other types of skills to complement that effectively.

And you have senior people who have a lot of the context, who have the domain, whether around an industry or function or under process, but sometimes lack, you know, can be can lack the adaptability and we need to, you know, help them become more adaptable. You will have, you know, young graduates that.

You hire, which will have maybe in many cases more adaptability but may lack, you know, the context and domain.

So how can we really, you know, and why does it take 10 years for someone to become experienced in a certain area, right?

If we can, we challenge human intellect and ramp those people up in 2, 3 years.

And at the same time give that, you know, portion of adaptability and curiosity to our senior people.

So both are very relevant.

You know, how can we help both transform into the new way of working is, is the question for the young people.

Also, we have to bring in emotional maturity that, you know, you can train on context, you can understand supply chain, you can understand marketing, you can understand AI agents very quickly.

But how do you then bring in enough of that, you know, emotional quotient so that because when you, you know, do some of this work, you need to bring in the human element into your thinking as well.

Thanks, Ashwin.

Samir, as a leader and as an executive in a global bank, you are embedding AI in your entire workflow, right?

Let me ask you this and pretty much similar to what Ashwin answered, how is the human edge evolving the way you design your workflows now and, and, and same the add on question just said.

Keeping that in mind, how are you building that leadership pipeline for the new future?

So I think the we are at a inflection point.

The technology advancement is immense, and therefore the possibilities are immense.

But having said that, think of a scenario where intelligent is intelligence is totally democratized.

Everyone has the same intelligence.

Then from an enterprise standpoint or individual standpoint, what is the competitive advantage?

What is the differentiator?

Actually, it's the human creativity, the decision making power.

In my mind that will become even more important to be the differentiator in a world era where everything of your intelligence is democratized.

So, but how decision making is done is going to evolve dramatically.

Today, as humans, maybe for a decision we consider 10 parameters or maybe 10 possibilities.

In the future, we have an AI agent which is helping us think through maybe thousands of parameters, thousands of possibilities, but being able to discern which one to take, being able to ask the right questions.

That will mean that our decision making process has to dramatically change, otherwise, we will not get value out of it.

So this whole evolution of a human decision making is going to be very key in DBS.

We are very clear that we want to be an AI enabled bank with a heart.

We believe that it is going to be humans which are being enhanced by AI, but it's always going to be a human working closely with agents, which will drive the next level of competitive advantage for us.

And that's where how we are thinking of it.

And in that context, within that context, leadership is very important.

How do you train not just leadership, but how do you train everyone to ask the right questions, to understand what the technology can do well, what it can't do, how do you understand when it goes wrong.

So all of this is an evolution, and these are very much part of how we do it.

The other thing as we think about the future, in the past, learning was all about knowing.

I mean, I remember when I was in school, oh, pani path ki ladai kab Hui was very important.

But how does it matter?

But marks were given by that, right?

Today, what is going to be more important is the attitude.

Do you have the right attitude?

Do you have a learning mindset?

Are you able to make a decision?

Are you able to synthesize and ask the right questions?

And that's where Human Edge will continue to drive that.

So I'm actually a firm believer that the human edge is going to be probably the only competitive advantage of the future, given that this technology will democratize data, democratize intelligence, democratize knowledge.

I agree with you, Samir.

I think the human edge is becoming more and more prominent.

And I love this part of your answer, that having the skill to ask the right question, frame the right question.

Vocabulary · 本日最多 5 个重点

Vocabulary — Day 57

每天最多 5 个最值得训练的项。优先:技术英语 / 工作表达 / 连读后难识别的表达。 本日音频已下载(无官方 transcript),请先盲听再复述,必要时对照官方字幕。 所有读音说明依据印度英语实际听感(个体差异大,仅供参考)。

1. on tap

Expression: on tap Meaning: 随时可用 Original sentence: If everyone has AI on tap. (标题) Natural pronunciation note (Indian English): on tap 连读 on-tap,p 不爆破。 My own simple paraphrase: 像水龙头一样随手可用。 Example: With AI on tap, everyone can use it.

2. set apart / sets you apart

Expression: set apart / sets you apart Meaning: 使你脱颖而出 Original sentence: What sets leaders apart? Natural pronunciation note (Indian English): set apart 连读 se-ta-part。 My own simple paraphrase: 让你与众不同。 Example: Judgment sets great leaders apart.

3. differentiate / differentiation

Expression: differentiate / differentiation Meaning: 差异化 Original sentence: how companies differentiate. Natural pronunciation note (Indian English): differentiate 重音在 ren /ˌdɪf.əˈren.ʃi.eɪt/。 My own simple paraphrase: 做出区分。 Example: Data gives firms a differentiation edge.

4. competitive advantage

Expression: competitive advantage Meaning: 竞争优势 Original sentence: building a competitive advantage. Natural pronunciation note (Indian English): competitive 重音在 pet /kəmˈpet̬.ə.t̬ɪv/。 My own simple paraphrase: 比对手强的优势。 Example: AI maturity is a competitive advantage.

5. strategy

Expression: strategy Meaning: 战略 Original sentence: a clear AI strategy. Natural pronunciation note (Indian English): strategy 重音在 strat /ˈstræt̬.ə.dʒi/。 My own simple paraphrase: 长期规划。 Example: Every firm needs an AI strategy.

⚠️ 以上表达依据标题/主题推断。听完后请对照实际对白,删改不准确项。